4 is better than 2

May 21, 2024

Recent EntriesHomeJoin Fast Running Blog Community!PredictorHealthy RecipesQuadraballer's RacesFind BlogsMileage BoardTop Ten Excuses for Missing a RunTop Ten Training MistakesDiscussion ForumRace Reports Send A Private MessageWeek ViewMonth ViewYear View
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2006200720082009
15% off for Fast Running Blog members at St. George Running Center!

Location:

Earth

Member Since:

Dec 25, 2006

Gender:

Male

Goal Type:

Other

Short-Term Running Goals:


Click to donate
to Ukraine's Armed Forces
Miles:This week: 0.00 Month: 0.00 Year: 0.00
Saucony Triumph Progrid 5 Lifetime Miles: 47.00
Nike Free Lifetime Miles: 70.00
Easy MilesMarathon Pace MilesThreshold MilesVO2 Max MilesTotal Distance
6.000.000.000.006.00

I was very tired today, my legs would barely move when I was getting started, felt good by the time the run ended.  Ran City Creek Canyon.

Night Sleep Time: 0.00Nap Time: 0.00Total Sleep Time: 0.00Weight: 0.00Calories: 0.00
Comments
From Sasha Pachev on Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:09:22

How fast can you run 100 meters all out? The reason I am asking is that I am wondering if your drop in 5 K performance compared to the time when you ran 15:10 is due to biomechanical deterioration or rather the loss of endurance. Your form on the picture looks very good, like you could still run 15:10. Your performance on the uphill leg of Wasatch Back last year is an indicator that you still have good form.

I see 100 meters all out as a fairly reliable test of biomechanics for a distance runner. I think 15.0 is possible with bad biomechanics, but 12.5 would be very challenging even if you have all the fast twitch muscle in the world. But a slow-twitch dominant runner with proper biomechanics can run 12.5.

From Sasha Pachev on Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 15:27:07

It did not surprise me that you managed 13.4 in less than ideal conditions. You were also tired from yesterday's workout, and the run this morning. You just proved my suspicion. That picture looked way too good to blame your 5 K speed loss on biomechanics. You did lose a bit, maybe a second per 100 meters in all out speed due to some biomechanical deterioration, but that is not where most of your problem lies. That should only slow you down by no more than 50 seconds in a 5 K, which means you should be running around 16:00 right now. Your college endurance went somewhere.

I would recommend focusing on two things to get it back - mileage and diet.

From Scott Browning on Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 16:30:08

Thanks Sasha,

I agree, I think most of what I have lost is due to lack of mileage and any decent training in recent years. I am working on nutrition as well - it is coming along well.

Add Your Comment.
  • Keep it family-safe. No vulgar or profane language. To discourage anonymous comments of cowardly nature, your IP address will be logged and posted next to your comment.
  • Do not respond to another person's comment out of context. If he made the original comment on another page/blog entry, go to that entry and respond there.
  • If all you want to do is contact the blogger and your comment is not connected with this entry and has no relevance to others, send a private message instead.
Only registered users with public blogs are allowed to post comments. Log in with your username and password or create an account and set up a blog.
Debt Reduction Calculator
Featured Announcements
Lone Faithfuls
(need a comment):
Recent Comments: